Legal Opinion

Inter. Com. Commis'n v. CHICAGO & C. R'D CO.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 2, 1902No. 154PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

186 U.S. 320 (1902)

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

v.

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY.

No. 154.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 7, 8, 1901.

Decided June 2, 1902.

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.

Mr. William A. Day, Mr. S.H. Cowan and Mr. David Willcox for appellant. Mr. James M. Beck was on their brief.

Mr. Lloyd Bowers for appellees. Mr. Frank B. Kellogg and Mr. Robert Dunlap were on his brief.

2Opinion of the Court · WhiteJustice White

This record requires us to determine whether the court below rightly refused to enforce an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, by which it was…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Covington Stock-Yards Co. v. KeithSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BehlmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

4Cited by28 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Communications Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. StickneySupreme Court of the United States · 1909

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API