Legal Opinion

Garrison Coal Co. v. Hinds

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1925No. 16017PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, C.

The defendant in error commenced his action against the plaintiff in error for the recovery of demurrage charges. The petition alleged, in substance:(1) That various carload shipments of freight were transported to the defendant at Oklahoma City by the Santa Fe Railway Company during the first nine months of 1918. (2) That the cars were delivered at the usual and customary place -for the defendant to unload the shipments; that the defendant was entitled to 48 hours’ “free time” in which to unload the cars after the same were placed for unloading; that delays beyond…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. HefleySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. McFadden v. Alabama Great Southern R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  4. Davis v. Timmonsville Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
  5. Louisiana Ry. & Navigation Co. v. HollySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Southwestern Railway Co. v. MaysDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1959
  2. Minton v. General Shale Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
  3. Robert McDaniel Trucking Co. v. Oak Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Union Barge Line Corp. v. Carter Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1972
  5. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Daugherty-McKey & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API