Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON. C.
In the view taken of this case by this court, it will not be necessary to take up the specifications of error in their order as they are assigned and discussed by plaintiff and defendant in their briefs, but the decision of this case must rest upon the answer to the single question:
“Was plaintiff, under- the record here presented, entitled to maintain this action for conversion against the defendant?”
The shipment in question was an interstate shipment, originating at Grigsby, Tex. In such case the various acts of Congress, known as the Interstate Commerce' Act, are…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. City of CovingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Aylesbury Mercantile Co. v. FitchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Bell v. Riggs Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Collinsville Nat. Bank v. EsauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Segars v. Classen Garage and Service Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980