Legal Opinion

Associated Constructors, Inc. v. Paonessa

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1939No. L. A. 16926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

On September 11, 1933, a judgment in the sum of $2,520 was entered in favor of the defendants upon their cross-complaint in the above-entitled action against the plaintiff, Associated Constructors, Inc.,, a corporation. Thereupon the plaintiff and cross-defendant appealed from the judgment, and at the instance of the appellant, Harold Fisch and Laura Fisch offered themselves as sureties upon an undertaking to stay execution of the judgment pending the appeal. On November 8, 1933, the respondents filed a notice of exception to the form of the undertaking on appeal, as well as to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Fried v. RivkinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  3. McColgan v. ScobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RumbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Albertsworth v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Joseph W. Schoenfeld, and Gladys W. Schoenfeld v. R. E. Neher and Marjorie E. NeherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  4. State v. RumbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API