Legal Opinion

McColgan v. Scoble

California Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1935No. S. F. 14995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Plaintiff, in an action of ejectment, recovered judgment against defendants, Thomas and Alice Scoble, for the possession of the real property involved in said action and damages for the wrongful use and occupation of said property. The defendants appealed, and gave an undertaking staying execution with the appellants, A. J. Harwood and Hyman Harris, as sureties. Plaintiff excepted to the sufficiency of said sureties, and a day was noticed for their justification. The time thus noticed was by stipulation of the parties continued on several occasions, the last continuance carrying the time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Manning v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Moffat v. GreenwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Fried v. RivkinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Associated Constructors, Inc. v. PaonessaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Rogers v. Day & United Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API