Legal Opinion
Meeker v. IDS Property Casualty Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 21, 2014No. A13-1302PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Appellants challenge the summary judgment dismissing their property-damage claim against respondent insurer, arguing that the district court erred by determining that respondent was not effectively served by substitute service under Minn. Stat. § 45.028, subd. 2, before the limitations period in their policy expired. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellants Robert and Jacqueline Meeker filed a claim with respondent IDS Property and Casualty Insurance Company, alleging that their home was damaged during a June 17, 2010 storm. Respondent denied appellants’ claim, and, after…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Mercer v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Carlson v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- 301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. BarrientosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robert Meeker v. IDS Property Casualty Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Gregory B. Lindwall v. Country Preferred Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014