Legal Opinion
State v. Barrientos
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 25, 2013No. A12-0150PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Justice.
In this case, we address the parameters of a district court’s authority to extend the length of a defendant’s probation for failure to pay court-ordered restitution. The district court concluded that Minn.Stat. § 609.135, subd. 2(g) (2012), limited its authority to grant an extension based on unpaid restitution to two separate one-year periods. The State appealed, and the court of appeals affirmed. We conclude that MinmStat. §§ 609.135, subd. la, and 609.14 (2012), grant a district court authority to extend a term of probation up to the statutory maximum based on a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. BlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Meeker v. IDS Property Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- BVA Equities, LLC, Relator v. City of New HopeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jason Turner Johnson, AppellantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
- State v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.