Legal Opinion
Robert Meeker v. IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 8, 2015No. A13-1302PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
We have before us a question of statutory interpretation in which the sole issue is whether substituted service of process under Minn.Stat. § 45.028, subd. 2 (2014), is effective when a plaintiff makes service before the limitations period in an insurance policy has expired, but then files the affidavit of compliance after the period has expired. Respondents Robert and Jacqueline Meeker brought an action against appellant IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company after the insurer denied their claim for property damage. It is undisput ed that the Meekers served IDS, but…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Heather Leann HorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Carlson v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wong v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Cornell v. RipkaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- J. Moore L.L.C., Appellant, vs. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, RespondentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
- Living Word Christian Center v. Church Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.