Legal Opinion

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of BACH

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar filed 23 specific charges against the accused. Generally, the accused is. charged •with (1) failing to maintain adequate records and accounts of trust assets; (2) making improper loans of trust assets to clients and other persons who were not beneficiaries of the trust; and (3) misappropriating trust assets. The accused’s amended answer admits making many of the loans and that he used trust assets to secure a personal obligation. The trial committee found the accused guilty of mishandling his client’s trust account which “resulted in a substantial loss to his client” and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. HoneymanOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In Re IrwinOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PenningtonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaplesOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DuganOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RobesonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of AlbrightOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re BachOregon Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API