Legal Opinion

In Re Irwin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1939PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This matter is before us upon the recommendation of the Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar (1935 Session Laws, ch. 28, § 1) that John Irwin of Klamath Falls, who was licensed in 1908 to practice law, be suspended from that privilege for a period of one year. The recommendation was in exercise of the power conferred upon the board by § 13 of the above act, and was preceded by findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by a trial committee composed of Mr. H. H. DeArmond of Bend (member of the board of governors), Mr. E. O. Stadter of Bend, and Mr. Herbert P. Welch of Lakeview.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goldstone v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Moses v. Bagley & SewellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  3. Reynolds v. Sorosis Fruit CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Gabrielson v. GorinWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. George v. Oregon, California & Eastern Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Levine v. Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Reid v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. Roberts v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Magee v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API