Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Staples

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1971PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

1. The Oregon State Bar has brought disciplinary proceedings charging the accused attorney with un ethical and illegal conduct. The charges all concerned the accused’s receipt of money for investment from one client.

The accused became acquainted with his client by representing her in a divorce proceeding. At the conclusion of the divorce she asked him to invest some funds for her and he agreed. The bar charges the investment was made upon the accused’s inducement; however, even the client’s testimony is to the contrary.

In May 1967 the client withdrew $18,000 from a savings account and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Toomey v. MOORE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. KupecWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. TattersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re Complaint of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API