Goldstein v. Gontarz
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.
In this action for personal injuries in which the plaintiff Louis Goldstein recovered verdicts against the defendants, Yale Transport Corporation and its agent Theodore Gontarz, we hold that the judge did not err in denying the defendants’ motions for directed verdicts, but that the judgments cannot stand because the plaintiff put irrelevant and prejudicial matter before the jury and the judge failed to take corrective action. We also discuss other points that may arise on a new trial.
We state the facts of the accident as they could appear to the jury. The plaintiff was employed as a foreman…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Tipton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Corsetti v. Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- LaClair v. Silberline Manufacturing Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Robert L. Sullivan, D.D.S., P.C. v. BirminghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Griffin v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.