State v. Calcutt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The burden of the defendant’s first complaint is, that having paid the State of North Carolina $105,555.00 in license taxes for the privilege of operating 5,258 slot machines within the State, he ought not now to be prosecuted for exercising these licenses. The soundness of the defendant’s position in this respect is not questioned by the State. Indeed, it would perhaps be conceded. But this is not the case sub judice. The defendant has pleaded guilty to violations of the criminal law, and the licenses issued by the Revenue Department do not purport to authorize any such conduct. Nor did the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- State v. Perkins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State v. . MalpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- McCormick v. . ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Spaugh v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. StonestreetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. LanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.