Legal Opinion

State v. Lance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1956No. 1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The bill of indictment charges a violation of G.S. 14-177. It does not allege the age of the defendant or the age of Cecil Henderson. The evidence shows that the defendant was 23 years of age, and the pathic a 13 year old schoolboy.

The defendant presents for decision one question: should the State have been nonsuited? He admits in his brief there can be no doubt the State’s evidence, when considered in its most favorable light, made a case for the jury under G.S. 14-177. The defendant bases his appeal on the single contention that, when a person over 16 years of age commits a crime against…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. United States v. YuginovichSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Red Rock v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. WhittemoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. State v. ElamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Duke Power Company v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. HarwardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API