State v. Lance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The bill of indictment charges a violation of G.S. 14-177. It does not allege the age of the defendant or the age of Cecil Henderson. The evidence shows that the defendant was 23 years of age, and the pathic a 13 year old schoolboy.
The defendant presents for decision one question: should the State have been nonsuited? He admits in his brief there can be no doubt the State’s evidence, when considered in its most favorable light, made a case for the jury under G.S. 14-177. The defendant bases his appeal on the single contention that, when a person over 16 years of age commits a crime against…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. YuginovichSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Red Rock v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. WhittemoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. ElamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Duke Power Company v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. HarwardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.