Legal Opinion

Claim of De Croix v. N. Sumergrade & Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 1964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The board awarded to claimant the cost of transportation to and from work by means of his own automobile, as “ necessary for the claimant’s physical support”, upon medical testimony that following healed leg fractures claimant was left with limitation of motion at the ankle, traumatic arthritis of the ankle and an ankle ulcer, and that claimant’s previous mode of transportation by subway was precarious in that the stairs and crowds subjected him to risk of irreparable injury. In Matter of Carniato v. Foster Wheeler Corp. (7 A D 2d 328), this court, per Bergan, J., flatly held (p. 329):…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. R & T Construction Co. v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Terry Grantham Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Claim of Nallan v. Motion Picture Studio Mechanics Union, Local No. 52Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. R & T CONSTRUCTION CO. v. JudgeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Claim of Kranis v. Trunz, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API