Legal Opinion

Tina Popa v. Nancy Berryhill

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 2017No. 15-16848PublishedCited by 272 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MORRIS, District Judge:

Tina Marie Popa appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. We possess jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse and remand for an award of benefits.

I

Tina Marie Popa applied for supplemental security income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381 et seq., on May 9, 2011. Popa alleges disability due to mood disorder,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. James L. Batson, Sr. v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Robbins v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Silva Tonapetyan v. William A. Halter, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by272 opinions

  1. Michelle Ford v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Lorain Ann Stiffler v. Martin O'MalleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. Jeffery Barnes v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Guzman v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
  5. Leah Y. v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019

267 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API