Legal Opinion

Guzman v. Berryhill

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 20, 2018No. Case No.: 17-cv-2593-CAB-AGSPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 13);

2. DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 21); AND

3. REMANDING TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo, United States District Judge

Plaintiff seeks disability benefits from the Social Security Administration. In finding that she did not qualify for those benefits, the Administrative Law Judge concluded that her diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder did not have any limitation on her ability to work. But to arrive at that conclusion, the ALJ ignored the majority of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Jasim Ghanim v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Trevizo v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bivins v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  2. Duhamel v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  3. Kovach v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
  4. Lee Taylor v. SaulDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  5. Nichols v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API