Legal Opinion
Leah Y. v. Berryhill
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 24, 2019No. Case No. 6:18-cv-00273-SUPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, United States Magistrate Judge:
Plaintiff Leah Y. brings this action pursuant to the Social Security Act (the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner") denying her Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB") under Title II of the Act. 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. For the following reasons, the Court REVERSES the Commissioner's decision and REMANDS for further administrative proceedings.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff applied for DIB on December 18, 2013, claiming disability beginning December 6, 2013. Tr.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022