Legal Opinion

Mohawk Iron & Steel Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 17, 1953No. C. D. 1533PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawbence, Judge:

Round forms of an aluminum alloy /i of am inch in diameter in straight lengths of 88% and 98% inches were classified by the collector of customs as wire, pursuant to the provision im *275paragraph 316 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 316 (a)), as modified, by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, and assessed with duty at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem.

The plaintiff (importer) claims that the merchandise consists of aluminum rods and that it should be classified as such in 'accordance with the provisions of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robertson v. SalomonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. United States v. Doragon Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Zanin & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  2. H. J. Van Der Ryn, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Pheoll Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Atlantic Aluminum & Metal Distributors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API