Legal Opinion

H. J. Van Der Ryn, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 5, 1958No. C. D. 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LawrenCE, Judge:

Certain imported merchandise, described on the invoice as “Electro Copper Bars,” was classified by the col*91lector of customs as articles in chief value of metal, not specially provided for, in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement-on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem.

It is the claim of importers that the merchandise is eo nomine provided for as copper rods within the provisions of paragraph 381 of said act (19 U. S. C. §…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mohawk Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Browning Metals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. Nahrgang v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API