Legal Opinion

Zanin & Son, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 19, 1963No. C.D. 2385PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

The above-enumerated protest is directed against the classification and assessment with duty of certain brass rods imported from West Germany. The merchandise in issue would appear to be limited to that covered by commercial invoice No. 97122, accompanying the entry herein and described as follows: “Brass rods, as per our improved die No. 10000 in fix lengths, weight per metre approx. 0,257 kg, 6' x ys" x 14" x %6" x 14"=1828,8 x 3,175 x 6,350x1,587x12,7 mm,”

*38Said merchandise was classified by the collector of customs as manufactured articles, not specially provided for,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mohawk Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Pheoll Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baldwin Hardware Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Baldwin Hardware Mfg. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Baldwin Hdwe. Mfg. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Baldwin Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Baldwin Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API