Legal Opinion

Pheoll Manufacturing Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 24, 1958No. C. D. 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

The merchandise before the court in this case consists of cold rolled nut stock steel, imported in coils of various lengths, having a width of inch, and a thickness of either inch or inch. It was classified as steel in strips, not thicker than }{ inch and not *224exceeding 16 inches in width, and, accordingly, was assessed with duty at the rate of 12J¿ per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 316 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 84 Treas. Dec. 403, T. D. 52373, supplemented by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mohawk Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Burgess Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  3. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. United States v. Ashcroft Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zanin & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  2. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Browning Metals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API