Legal Opinion
Land Grantors in Henderson, Union v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 24, 2009No. 93-648XPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REPORT OF THE REVIEW PANEL
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge,
with whom SMITH, Senior Judge, joins in the Report. LETTOW, Judge and Presiding Officer, dissents to the Report.
On September 20, 1993, the United States Senate referred Senate Bill 794, 103d Cong. (1993) entitled, “A bill [f]or the relief of land grantors in Henderson, Union, and Webster Counties, Kentucky, and their heirs,” to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims and instructed the Court to report back to the Senate “giving such findings of fact and conclusions that are sufficient to inform Congress of the amount, if…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Milmark Services, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jana, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Utah State Tax Commission v. StevensonUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Reilly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Pds Consultants, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- National Telecommuting Institute, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Bautista v. TorresSuperior Court of Guam · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.