Legal Opinion
Van Allen v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 13, 2005No. 05-166 CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MEROW, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Harold W. Van Alen, seeks military disability retirement pay and health care reimbursement retroactive to 1978. Plaintiff claims that he is eligible for military disability retirement pay based on his service in the United States Navy and a finding by the Social Security Administration that he was “completely disabled” from June 1978 through December 1986. The matter is now before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ferreiro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Smalls v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Sumner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.