United States v. Jones
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
*830DECISION
KASTL, Judge:
We hold valid, on the facts of this case, a military exchange store detective’s questioning of the accused despite the fact that she did not warn him of his rights under Article 31(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 831(b).
In November 1979, Mrs. Louan Channel, a civilian, was employed as a part-time Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES) store detective. Serving with her was Airman Farney, an off-duty security policeman recently hired by the Exchange as a detective for the Christmas season.
Observing the accused shopping in the Exchange, Mrs. Channel…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. DugaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. DoctorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. SeayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. QuillenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. WynnU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. BrittonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. SvobodaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982