Legal Opinion

United States v. Jones

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 30, 1981No. ACM 22983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*830DECISION

KASTL, Judge:

We hold valid, on the facts of this case, a military exchange store detective’s questioning of the accused despite the fact that she did not warn him of his rights under Article 31(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 831(b).

In November 1979, Mrs. Louan Channel, a civilian, was employed as a part-time Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES) store detective. Serving with her was Airman Farney, an off-duty security policeman recently hired by the Exchange as a detective for the Christmas season.

Observing the accused shopping in the Exchange, Mrs. Channel…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. DugaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. DoctorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  4. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. SeayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. QuillenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. WynnU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
  3. United States v. BrittonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. SvobodaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API