Legal Opinion

Landico, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 25, 1997No. C9-96-1727PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant Landico, Inc. sued respondent American Family Mutual Insurance Company for breach of an insurance contract. On the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court denied Landico’s motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment in favor of American Family on the ground that the parties’ policy unambiguously restricts Landico’s recovery to the $100,000 policy limit. On appeal, Lan-dico seeks review of the district court decision finding the insurance policy unambiguous and limiting Landico’s recovery. We affirm.

FACTS

Qn January 4, 1993,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Board of Regents v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Dynamic Air, Inc. v. BlochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Robben & Sons Heating, Inc. v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Evergreen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Cincinnati Insurance v. Sherman & Hemstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance v. Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar CooperativeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API