Legal Opinion

Robben & Sons Heating, Inc. v. Mid-Century Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 13, 2003No. 0101-01129, A117333PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Plaintiff insured appeals from a judgment for defendant insurer after a stipulated facts trial. The trial court ruled that defendant did not breach the terms of its insurance policy with plaintiff when it refused to afford more than $50,000 in coverage under its policy for thefts committed by plaintiffs former employee. We review the trial court’s ruling, an interpretation of an insurance contract, as a question of law, Hoffman Construction Co. v. Fred S. James & Co., 313 Or 464, 469, 836 P2d 703 (1992), and reverse.

At trial, the parties stipulated to the relevant facts. Plaintiff purchased…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Pierce v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Fleming v. United Services Automobile Assn.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Fleming v. United Services Automobile Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Landico, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rainforest Chocolate, LLC v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  2. Summit Real Estate Mgmt., LLC v. Mid-Century Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Ad Adver. Design, Inc. v. Sentinel Ins. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2018
  4. The Arc In Hawaii, Inc. v. DB Insurance Co., Ltd formerly known as Dongbu Insurance Co., Ltd.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API