Robben & Sons Heating, Inc. v. Mid-Century Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Plaintiff insured appeals from a judgment for defendant insurer after a stipulated facts trial. The trial court ruled that defendant did not breach the terms of its insurance policy with plaintiff when it refused to afford more than $50,000 in coverage under its policy for thefts committed by plaintiffs former employee. We review the trial court’s ruling, an interpretation of an insurance contract, as a question of law, Hoffman Construction Co. v. Fred S. James & Co., 313 Or 464, 469, 836 P2d 703 (1992), and reverse.
At trial, the parties stipulated to the relevant facts. Plaintiff purchased…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Pierce v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Fleming v. United Services Automobile Assn.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Fleming v. United Services Automobile Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Landico, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rainforest Chocolate, LLC v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Summit Real Estate Mgmt., LLC v. Mid-Century Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Ad Adver. Design, Inc. v. Sentinel Ins. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2018
- The Arc In Hawaii, Inc. v. DB Insurance Co., Ltd formerly known as Dongbu Insurance Co., Ltd.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2021