Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Insurance v. Sherman & Hemstreet, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 28, 2003No. A02A2158PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Sherman & Hemstreet, Inc. (Sherman) sued its insurer, Cincinnati Insurance Company (Cincinnati), because the insurer would pay only a portion of its claim. Based upon a joint statement of undisputed material facts, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The trial court denied Cincinnati’s motion and granted Sherman’s, awarding it the remaining unpaid amount. Cincinnati appeals. While the record supports' the trial court’s denial of summary judgment to Cincinnati and its grant of summary judgment to Sherman on the issue of liability, it does not support the amount…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Claussen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  2. Karen Kane Inc. v. Reliance Insurance Company, a Corporation, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. A.B.S. Clothing Collection, Inc. v. Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Hopkins Sporting Goods, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. Tachdjian v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sherman & Hemstreet, Inc. v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Sherman & Hemstreet, Inc. v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API