Legal Opinion

Shippy v. Hollopeter

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1981No. 13058PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Justice.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs declaring a prescriptive easement and granting damages against defendants Hollopeter. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Plaintiffs own the Southwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ and the Southwest ¼ of Section Eleven, Township 96, Range 75, West Fifth PM in Tripp County. Defendants Hollopeter own the Northwest ⅝ and defendants Miller own the Northwest ⅝ of the Southeast ¼ of Section Eleven. Plaintiffs claim a right-of-way easement by prescription across the land of each defendant at the center of the section. The parallel…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hilde v. FloodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. City of Rapid City v. HoogterpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Cuka v. Jamesville Hutterian Mutual SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Lien v. Northwestern Engineering Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Kougl v. CurrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. TinagliaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Brafford v. Susquehanna Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1984
  3. Peterson v. BeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hofmeister v. SparksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Rotenberger v. BurghduffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API