Shippy v. Hollopeter
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOSHEIM, Justice.
Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs declaring a prescriptive easement and granting damages against defendants Hollopeter. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Plaintiffs own the Southwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ and the Southwest ¼ of Section Eleven, Township 96, Range 75, West Fifth PM in Tripp County. Defendants Hollopeter own the Northwest ⅝ and defendants Miller own the Northwest ⅝ of the Southeast ¼ of Section Eleven. Plaintiffs claim a right-of-way easement by prescription across the land of each defendant at the center of the section. The parallel…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hilde v. FloodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- City of Rapid City v. HoogterpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Cuka v. Jamesville Hutterian Mutual SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Lien v. Northwestern Engineering Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- Kougl v. CurrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cleveland v. TinagliaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Brafford v. Susquehanna Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- Peterson v. BeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Hofmeister v. SparksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Rotenberger v. BurghduffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.