Hofmeister v. Sparks
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Kenneth and Mary Lou Hofmeis-ter; Scott Dunham; John, Katherine, Thomas and Kaye Overby; and, Frederick and Cynthia Heigold (collectively referred to as Hofmeister), own land in a subdivision in the Black Hills. Their property rights include a platted “66' access easement” across two other parcels of land. The easement gives them access from their land to Nemo Road, a public highway. Gary Sparks, a landowner upon which a portion of the access easement lies, placed a gate across the easement. Sparks contended that the easement was no longer valid. Hofmeister thereafter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cleveland v. TinagliaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Clark v. RedlichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- City of Rapid City v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Kougl v. CurrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Selway Homeowners Ass'n v. CummingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. McCrarySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Brown v. CahansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Graves v. DennisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Vivian Scott Trust v. ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Swaby v. Northern Hills Regional Railroad AuthoritySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.