Legal Opinion

Hofmeister v. Sparks

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Kenneth and Mary Lou Hofmeis-ter; Scott Dunham; John, Katherine, Thomas and Kaye Overby; and, Frederick and Cynthia Heigold (collectively referred to as Hofmeister), own land in a subdivision in the Black Hills. Their property rights include a platted “66' access easement” across two other parcels of land. The easement gives them access from their land to Nemo Road, a public highway. Gary Sparks, a landowner upon which a portion of the access easement lies, placed a gate across the easement. Sparks contended that the easement was no longer valid. Hofmeister thereafter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. TinagliaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Clark v. RedlichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. City of Rapid City v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kougl v. CurrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Selway Homeowners Ass'n v. CummingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McCrarySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Brown v. CahansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Graves v. DennisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Vivian Scott Trust v. ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Swaby v. Northern Hills Regional Railroad AuthoritySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API