Guenesa v. Ralph v. Rulon, Inc.

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The only question involved in this workmen’s compensation case is whether the claimant met with an accident in the course of his employment. The conclusion of the compensation authorities was favorable to the claimant. The learned court below, in reversing, held that under the undisputed facts he was not entitled to an award. We all think the court was right. ,

The appellant, an employee of defendant company for a number of years, lived in Philadelphia and worked at defendant’s plant at Marcus Hook. His hours were from 7 a. m. to 4 p. m. He received a salary of $50 per…