Doorley v. Buford & George Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Kingfisher County. Action in replevin. Judgment for plaintiffs, from which defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Bierer, J.:
The judgment in this case from which the appeal is taken was rendered in the district court on the 7th day of November, 1895. On the 11th day of November, 1895, the 10th day of November being Sunday, defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which was, on the 16th day of November, overruled, and exception taken. The appeal was filed in this court on the 16th day of November, 1896.
The only action of the court which is challenged by the motion for a new trial is in sustaining plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, and giving…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thompson v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Osborne v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Hicks v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
3Cited by28 opinions
- Richardson Et Vir v. BeidlemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Board of County Commissioners of Garfield v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Burdett v. BurdettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Bellamy v. Washita Valley Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Kline v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1927
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.