Richardson Et Vir v. Beidleman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; W. L. Barnum, Judge. Action by Katy Richardson and James Richardson against George C. Beidleman and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants (defendants in error) on April 2, 1910. On the same day the plaintiffs (plaintiffs in error) filed their motion for new trial. On June 6, 1910, the same was overruled. Thereupon the plaintiffs were allowed 90 days in which to make and serve a case-ma,de, the defendants to have 30 days to suggest amendments, and the case-made to be presented for settlement by either party giving the other ten days’ notice. On June 7, 1910, plaintiffs filed a motion to set aside the judgment formerly entered, which was overruled. Motion for new trial upon the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tribal Development Co. v. White Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Bettis v. CargileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Am. Nat. Bank of McAlester v. Mergenthaler LinotypeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Burdett v. BurdettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Brigham v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Davis v. De GeerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Scott v. Woods Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Murphy v. FitchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Billington v. GraysonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.