Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners of Garfield v. Porter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1907PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Error from the District Court of Garfield County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

The defendant in error, Porter, served two terms as sheriff of Garfield county. The other defendants in error were sureties ¡on his official bond. The board of county commissioners allowed and paid him for transporting prisoners to the. penitentiary, and for transporting insane persons. This is an action to recover the moneys so illegally allowed and paid. The defendants in error pleaded the settlements with the county board as an estoppel. The district court heard the case upon an agreed statement of facts and gave judgment for the defendants in error,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  2. Doorley v. Buford & George Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  3. Abel v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. Horn v. Newton City BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  5. Polson v. Purcell and JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bettis v. CargileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Devault v. Merchants' Exch. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Stanard v. Sampson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Garland v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Carr v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API