Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion for Rehearing. The opinion, filed January 10, 1891, sufficiently states the case.

1Per curiam

It was urged in support of a rehearing of this ease that the former opinion was in conflict with Cable v. Coates, 36 Kas. 191. Cable v. Coates followed English v. Williamson, 34 Kas. 212. The opinion, however, in the former case failed to state, as it should have done, that September 4, 1881, was Sunday. In the case of English v. Williamson, it was said that —

“Under the statute above quoted, (Civil Code, §722,) when the last day comes on Sunday, that day, as well as the first, shall be excluded, and we suppose our tax laws, as well as all other statutes, were enacted with reference to this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. English v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Cable v. CoatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doorley v. Buford & George Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  2. Johnston v. New Omaha Thomson-Houston Electric Light Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Styles v. DickeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Miner v. TilleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API