Alexander v. Muenscher
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was brought seeking an injunction to prevent the defendant from diverting waters from what is alleged to be a watercourse. To the amended complaint, which will be referred to as the complaint, a demurrer was interposed, based upon a number of grounds, one of which was that the plaintiffs had no capacity to sue. After the action had been instituted, a temporary injunction was issued. The trial was to the court without a jury, and, at the conclusion of the evidence and before the argument of counsel, the court, accompanied by the parties to the action and their respective attorneys,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Rigney v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- Hollett v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Nathanson v. WagnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Davies v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by7 opinions
- King County v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Island County v. MacKieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- DiBlasi v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Snohomish County v. PostemaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- DiBlasi v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.