Legal Opinion

Snohomish County v. Postema

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 9, 1998No. 41300-7-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

— The trial court’s decision to dismiss David Smith’s claims for trespass and nuisance against John and Maryke Postema is reversed and this case is remanded for trial. There are material questions of fact relative to the application of “the common enemy doctrine” to this action for damages caused by clearing and draining a wetland.

John and Maryke Postema own a Washington corporation doing business as Flower World in Snohomish County. In 1990, they purchased 8.3 acres in that county from Nancy Harris, which they leased to the corporation.1 Three county drainage ditches enter the property, two…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Rigney v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Wilber Development Corp. v. Les Rowland Constr., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Fitzpatrick v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Fitzpatrick v. Okanogan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Fitzpatrick v. Okanogan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Lord v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API