Legal Opinion

Hollett v. Davis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1909No. 7710PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Klickitat county, McCredie, J., entered February 25, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the diversion, and apportioning waters used for irrigation, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In 1873 the predecessors in interest of the appellant settled upon, and thereafter acquired from the government, the north half of the southeast quarter of section one, in township four, north, of range fourteen, east of the Willamette Meridian. Near the south side of the tract, about midway between its east and west ends, is a large perpetual spring, the stream from which originally flowed southerly in a natural channel across the south half of the southeast quarter of section one, and across the east half of section twelve, in the same township and range, into a water course called Mill…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matheson v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chowchilla Farms Inc. v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. E. Clemens Horst Co. v. New Blue Point Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Rogers v. CationWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. In Re Ahtanum CreekWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Mason v. YearwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API