Nathanson v. Wagner
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The injunctive relief sought in this case is based on the relative rights of two adjoining landowners regarding surface waters. That subject has received much discussion in our courts as well as in the courts of other states and other lands, and the decisions are divided into two distinct and contrary classes, dependent upon whether they follow the civil or the common law. In New Jersey we have adopted the "Common Enemy" principle of the common law, with certain exceptions hereinafter noted.Lulevitch v. Roberts, 98 N.J. Eq. 373.
The case is before me on final hearing, which developed the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Price v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Bringhurst v. O'DonnellCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
- Uhl v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- Cassini v. OrangeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Field v. Inhabitants of West OrangeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cameron v. USAA Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- McCullough v. HartpenceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Richman v. Home Insurance Co. of New YorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Staats v. HubbardCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
- ADRIAN SOSA VS. MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY (L-0160-16, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.