Legal Opinion

Delgado v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided February 1, 1991No. CIV 90-1225 PHX SMMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

McNAMEE, District Judge.

Defendant Southern Pacific Transportation Company (“Southern Pacific”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on July 2, 1990. Plaintiff Alfredo Jaime Delgado (“Delgado”) filed a Response and a Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on September 28, 1990. Counsel argued the motions on December 3, 1990. The central issue in the motions is whether Southern Pacific owed Delgado a duty to prevent Delgado from boarding its trains in or near Southern Pacific’s Yuma railroad yard. Delgado’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment raises the issue of whether Southern Pacific’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. LueckArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Golden State Transit Corporation v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Veach v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1994
  2. Beesley v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2006
  3. Tucker v. Avondale, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API