Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. American Cyanamid Co.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided July 26, 1994No. CIV 91-2023-PHX-EHCPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARROLL, District Judge.

I. Background

Plaintiffs Ibrahin and Mabel Rodriguez purchased a mobile home for their son and daughter-in-law, Plaintiffs Richard and Jane Rodriguez. Richard and Jane purchased a package of three Combat indoor fogger “bug bombs.” On September 16, 1990, Richard and Jane set off the foggers while a stove pilot light was burning. The can and carton directions tell users to extinguish flames and pilot lights before activation. Within minutes, a fire exploded, virtually destroying the mobile home. The Tempe Fire Department Report valued the building at $14,000.00 and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Frank B. Fiedler v. Charles Clark, Acting Director of the Department of Health of the State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Products Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. 325-343 E. 56TH STREET CORP. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  2. Wallace v. Parks Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Lescs v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1997
  4. Canty v. Ever-Last Supply Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  5. Miller v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API