Laske v. Lampasona
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
The appeal is from a judgment in an action for specific performance instituted by the vendor under an agreement for the sale of real property, which judgment decreed specific performance of the agreement and directed the escrow holder to deliver to the defendants, vendees, the deed of plaintiff, vendor, and to deliver to plaintiff the sum of $17,500, and a note of defendants for $17,500 secured by a trust deed on the property.
The agreement was in the form of escrow instructions to a bank. Leo Lampasona and Nicholas Abraham, herein referred to as defendants, deposited in escrow $17,500 and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Sparks v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. AbbotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Greenzweight v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Minikin v. HendrixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Petersen v. HartellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Goldsworthy v. DobbinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Hollypark Realty Co. v. MacLoaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Petersen v. HartellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985