Legal Opinion
Minikin v. Hendrix
California Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1940No. L. A. No. 16187PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action was brought for a dissolution of partnership; for the appointment of a receiver; for an *339accounting, a sale of the partnership assets, and distribution of proceeds to the partners. As the result of the trial of one of the issues with respect to the accounting, the trial court rendered a judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $290, which was found to be one-half the total cost of several improvements made by the partnership on certain real property owned by defendant. The latter has appealed from that judgment.
It appears from the facts found by the trial court that on or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. AbbotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. HaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Deutschman v. DwyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Flint v. FlintNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
- Leffingwell v. FaubionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Swarthout v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Dowd v. GlennCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Wiese v. WieseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Speka v. SpekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Vollaro v. LispiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.