Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Hartell

California Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1985No. S.F. 24673Published

1Opinion of the Court

40 Cal.3d 102 (1985)

707 P.2d 232

219 Cal. Rptr. 170

RICHARD J. PETERSEN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

DOROTHY E. HARTELL, as Administratrix, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. S.F. 24673.

Supreme Court of California.

October 21, 1985.

COUNSEL

James L. Larson for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

John R. Hetland as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Anthony E. Graham for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

REYNOSO, J.

This appeal by plaintiff vendees who wilfully defaulted in making payments under an installment land sale contract requires us to reconsider such vendees' right to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API