Legal Opinion
Burbank v. Board of Education
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 5, 2011No. SC 18591PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The named plaintiff, Harold Burbank, and the plaintiffs Marianne Burbank and A.B.1 appeal2 from the judgment of the trial court denying their application for an injunction prohibiting the defendant, the board of education of the town of Canton (board), from implementing its policy of using law enforcement personnel with drug-sniffing dogs to conduct unannounced, suspicionless searches on school property without a warrant.3 Because we conclude that the plaintiffs’ claims are moot, we dismiss their appeal.
*836The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our analysis…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- In Re Jorden R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Sweeney v. SweeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Dutkiewicz v. DutkiewiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
3Cited by8 opinions
- Quiroga v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- City of Hartford v. CBV Parking Hartford, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Carter v. WatsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Aldin Associates Ltd. Partnership v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- CT Freedom Alliance, LLC v. Dept. of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.