Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2009No. 20080250PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Merwin Carlson appeals from a district court judgment affirming a decision by Workforce Safety & Insurance (“WSI”), which reconsidered its earlier decision granting Carlson workers’ compensation benefits and subsequently denied him benefits after WSI determined he was an independent contractor and was not an employee of GMR Transportation, Inc. Carlson argues WSI’s decision is void, because GMR’s attorneys were not authorized to practice law in North Dakota during WSI’s reconsideration of his claim. Carlson also argues WSI’s procedure for terminating his benefits…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. West Virginia State Bar v. EarleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Shortz v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Datz v. DoschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Carlson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Gregory Tyler Moore v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  4. State v. EbertzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. H & H Development, LLC v. RamlowMontana Supreme Court · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API