Legal Opinion

Shortz v. Farrell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1937No. Appeal, 133PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

Plaintiffs, members of a Committee of the Wilkes-Barre Law and Library Association of the Luzerne County Bar, brought a bill in equity in the court below to enjoin defendant from the unauthorized practice of law. Defendant is not an attorney at law, but is employed as a claim adjuster for the Globe Indemnity Company, and prepares and files “pleadings” in workmen’s compensation cases in which that company is a party defendant; he also, on its behalf, appears at hearings before the referees, examines and cross-examines witnesses, and there, in general, conducts the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Clark v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Johnston v. Payne-Yost Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. West Virginia State Bar v. EarleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Everett v. HarronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API