Carlson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Merwin Carlson appeals from a judgment affirming a Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) decision denying his claim for workers’ compensation benefits after remand in Carlson v. Workforce Safety & Ins., 2009 ND 87, 765 N.W.2d 691 (“Carlson I ”). Under Carlson I and the law of the case, we hold an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) erred in concluding WSI properly exercised its continuing jurisdiction under N.D.C.C. § 65-05-04 to deny Carlson benefits on remand. We reverse and remand for WSI to award Carlson benefits based on the ALJ’s calculation that Carlson’s average…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tom Beuchler Construction, Inc. v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Robertson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Rojas v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BurckhardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Sloan v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Walstad v. WalstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Coppage v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Willprecht v. WillprechtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Viscito v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- WSI v. OdenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.