Legal Opinion
United States v. Jesus Valdez-Novoa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 28, 2014No. 12-50336PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BYBEE; Dissent by Judge McKEOWN.
OPINION
BYBEE, Circuit Judge: -
Jesus Valdez-Novoa, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals his conviction for attempting to enter the United States without consent after having been previously removed in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
Valdez-Novoa entered the U.S. without inspection in 1983 and has never obtained legal status. On June 11, 1999, an Immigration Judge (IJ) deemed Valdez-Novoa removable and prohibited him from reentering the U.S. at any time because he had been convicted of an…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Jesus Valdez-NovoaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Hermilo ZamudioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Hermilo ZamudioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Jesus Valdez-NovoaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015