Legal Opinion
United States v. Jesus Valdez-Novoa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 28, 2014No. 12-50336PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion and dissent filed on July 28, 2014, and appearing at 760 F.3d 1013 (9th Cir.2014), are hereby amended. The superseding amended opinion and amended dissent will be filed concurrently with this order.
With these amended opinions, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc, filed September 10, 2014, is DENIED. No subsequent petitions…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Gonzalo Vasquez-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Almanza-VigilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. David Rosales-AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Abelardo Niebla-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Rogelio LemusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.